1. "What is Good for the Goose is Good for the Gambler: How the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act Fails to Abrogate State Immunity and Protects Tribal Immunity," Christopher J. Moore, Ohio Northern University Law Review, Vol. 21, No. 4 (1995), Pgs. 1203-1226

2. "Do the States Have an Ace in the Hole or Should the Indians Call Their Bluff? Tribes Caught in the Power Struggle Between the Federal Government and the States," Jason Kalish, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 38, No. 4 (1996), Pgs. 1345-1371

3. "Scope of Gaming Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988 After Rumsey v. Wilson: White Buffalo or Brown Cow," William E. Horwitz, Cardozo Arts and Entertainment, Vol. 14, No. 1 (1996), Pgs. 153-213

4. "An Introduction and Overview of Taxation and Indian Gaming," Scott A. Taylor, Arizona State Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1 (Spring 1997),Pgs. 251-271

5. "When Indian Law and Tax Law Collide: How Pulltabs Games Got to the Supreme Court," John Burgess, Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 49, No. 2 (2001), Pgs. 325-355

6. "Exclusivity Agreements in Tribal-State Compacts: Mutual Benefit Revenue-Sharing or Illegal State Taxation," Gatsby Contreras, The Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, Vol. 5, No. 2 (Spring 2002), Pgs. 487-511